Natsuho Arakawa vs Ikumi Yamazaki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L L W L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LH2H: Arakawa 1 - 0 Yamazaki
They have played 2 sets in total, with Arakawa winning 2 and Yamazaki winning 0. The last match between Arakawa and Yamazaki was at the W50 Caloundra, 17-11-2024, Q1 round, Hard with Natsuho Arakawa getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Natsuho Arakawa | 1 |
| Ikumi Yamazaki | 0 |
W50 Caloundra(17-11-2024)
6
3
6
3
| Arakawa | Stats | Yamazaki |
|---|---|---|
| 30% (3-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (12-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 857 | Ranking | 402 |
| 667 | Highest Rank | 402 |
| 27 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 44% (106-134) | Career Total W/L | 62% (115-71) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:36:0 | Average Match Time | 1:36:0 |
| 57% (33/58) | 1st Serve % | 73% (44/60) |
| 79% (26/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (26/44) |
| 44% (11/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 36% (21/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Natsuho Arakawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miyu Nakashima
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Funa Kozaki
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
11
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Junri Namigata
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
8
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
7
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Ikumi Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Kelly Keller
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Laura Samson
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
54%
(
25 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Eleonora Alvisi
86%
(
67 of
78)
1st Serve %
85%
(
82 of
97)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
43%
(
29 of
67)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
59%
(
46 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Kyoka Okamura
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
73%
(
92 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
54 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44% (106/134) | Win/Loss | 62% (115/71) |
| 44% (232/296) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (250/172) |
| 48% (2374/2532) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2060/1785) |
| 45% (100/121) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (47/36) |
| 30% (3/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (46/22) |
| 33% (3/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (15/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 100% (7/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 358 | Aces Total | 120 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 698 | Total Double Faults | 497 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:25:43 |
| 421.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.89 |
| 61% (5184/8540) | 1st Serve % | 69% (6854/9960) |
| 61% (3156/5184) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (3941/6854) |
| 43% (1427/3356) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1348/3106) |
| 40% (320/793) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (690/1389) |
| 39% (3249/8244) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4894/10170) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (38/75) | Challenger W/L | 62% (87/54) |
| 54% (68/59) | Futures W/L | 62% (28/17) |
| 43% (102/235) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (112/182) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 29% (12/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (16/26) |
| 53% (28/53) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 85% (104/88) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (103/95) |
| 15% (104/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (103/8) |
| 12% (136/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (82/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
